Sustainable Printing: Stone, Sugarcane, and Recycled Paper Compared

By Charles Ian Pritchard on December 21, 2022
Last updated on March 31, 2026

Choosing paper for printing can significantly impact environmental footprint. While recycled paper is a good step, wood-free alternatives like stone paper and sugarcane paper offer even greater sustainability benefits in terms of water and energy consumption, as well as CO2 emissions. This comparison explores which option offers the lowest environmental impact for your printing needs.

Below is a quick overview of how these paper types stack up.

Paper type:Recycled PaperBagasse (sugarcane)Stone paper
Ingredients100% Wastepaper100% Bagasse80% Pulverized limestone; 20% Polyethylene
Water Requirement per Ton of Paper20,500 l52,200l – 360l10 l
Energy Demand per Ton of Paper4194 kWh1985 kWh870 kWh
WasteLess than virgin fibernonenone
CO2 Emissions886 kg482 kg
Demand for Wood1,120 kg0 kg0 kg
Printableyesyesyes

1 Detailed explanation in the text

Comparing Sustainable Paper Options

When evaluating sustainable paper, primary considerations include ingredients, production processes, resource consumption, and waste generation.

What are the ingredients in sustainable papers?

All three paper types. recycled, bagasse (sugarcane), and stone paper. use waste products from other industries. Recycled paper uses wastepaper. Bagasse paper is made from sugarcane residue, a byproduct that would otherwise be burned. Stone paper uses pulverized limestone, a waste product from quarries. Both bagasse and stone paper are wood-free, unlike some recycled papers that may require fresh fibers. Stone paper does contain 20% polyethylene, a plastic, which acts as a binder. However, this plastic can come from recycled sources.

How are these sustainable papers produced?

The manufacturing methods for these papers are tailored to their raw materials but conclude with a pressing process to form the final sheet. Recycled paper production involves pulping wastepaper, cleaning, decolorizing with chemicals like caustic soda and hydrogen peroxide, and then pressing. Bagasse paper production is similar, involving boiling, washing, sieving, and bleaching sugarcane remnants. Stone paper production grinds calcium carbonate, forms small balls with polyethylene, and presses them. A coating is then applied to make it printable.

How much water and energy do sustainable papers consume?

Recycled paper uses significantly less water and energy than virgin fiber paper, cutting consumption by more than half. Stone paper remarkably requires no water in its production. Bagasse paper's exact water consumption is harder to pinpoint, but studies suggest it can save a substantial amount compared to virgin fiber. For energy, stone paper is the most efficient at 870 kWh per ton, followed by bagasse paper at 1985 kWh per ton, and recycled paper at 4194 kWh per ton.

What about waste and chemical use?

Both stone paper and bagasse paper production allow for the reuse of waste products in subsequent batches, leading to minimal waste. Recycled paper also generates less waste than virgin fiber paper. Stone paper is naturally bright, requiring no bleaching chemicals. While data for bagasse paper is less specific, methane emissions and chlorine use are generally lower compared to virgin fiber paper.

What are the CO2 emissions for each paper type?

Accurate CO2 emission data can be difficult to find for bagasse paper, but it generally has lower emissions than virgin fiber paper. Stone paper produces the lowest emissions among the three, at 482 kg per ton, while recycled paper generates 886 kg per ton. All these papers are printable, and the wood-free options mean no trees are cut down. The transport distances for recycled paper are often shorter due to localized recycling plants. For bagasse and stone paper, transport distances depend on the recipient, though bagasse factories are typically near sugar production sites, reducing raw material transport.

Conclusion

While moving from virgin fiber to recycled paper is a positive environmental step, looking at water, wood, and CO2 emissions, as well as energy consumption, highlights that even greater sustainability is possible with wood-free options. Stone and sugarcane papers are particularly well-suited for personal use. However, for larger organizations, recycled paper remains the most available sustainable choice.

With ezeep, printing can be CO2-neutral, as printouts are offset through partnerships with organizations like justdiggit.org. Features like ezeep Printer Profiles allow easy implementation of sustainable settings, such as duplex printing, for specific groups within an organization. Find more strategies for reducing CO2 emissions from printing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is recycled paper more sustainable than paper made from stone or sugarcane?

Recycled paper is not always more sustainable than paper made from stone or sugarcane. While recycled paper uses waste paper, its production still requires a significant amount of water and energy compared to stone paper, and sometimes even more water than sugarcane paper. The environmental advantages depend on specific factors like manufacturing processes and local resources.

How much water is needed to produce a ton of stone paper?

The production of stone paper requires no water. This is a significant environmental benefit compared to both recycled paper and sugarcane paper, which require thousands of liters per ton.

What are the main ingredients of stone paper?

Stone paper is primarily made from pulverized limestone, which constitutes 80% of its composition, along with 20% polyethylene. The limestone provides the paper's mineral content, while the polyethylene acts as a binder.

How do CO2 emissions compare between recycled, sugarcane, and stone paper?

Stone paper has the lowest CO2 emissions, at 306 kg per ton. Recycled paper produces 886 kg of CO2 per ton, while sugarcane paper falls in between with 680 kg per ton.

Back to top